The Right to Housing or to Private Property? From Public Policies to Urban Informality in the Metropolitan Area of Lima (1996Í€“2015)

Authors

  • Diana Torres Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
  • Javier Ruiz-Tagle Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612019000300005

Keywords:

urban periphery, human settlements, urban policy

Abstract

As a consequence of the massive titling policy implemented by the Peruvian government from 1996, thousands of citizens have become individual landowners; but this legal ownership has not improved the minimum habitability in urban settlements. We present a case study on the neighborhoods resulting from this mode of land production in the Metropolitan Area of Lima, proving that social organization is the one actually in charge of achieving urban consolidation, replacing the role of the State. It is concluded that this policy has induced in social organizations, the valuation of the private good over the collective struggle for the construction of the urban habitat, which is not only blocked, but also stopped. This situation is constantly reinforced by state institutions and the effects of economic restructuring.

Published

2019-09-02

How to Cite

Torres, D., & Ruiz-Tagle, J. (2019). The Right to Housing or to Private Property? From Public Policies to Urban Informality in the Metropolitan Area of Lima (1996Í€“2015). Revista EURE - Revista De Estudios Urbano Regionales, 45(136). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612019000300005

Issue

Section

Dossier: Derecho a la ciudad